Differential gene expression

Seurat Toolkit

Identify genes that are significantly over or under-expressed between conditions in specific cell populations.
Authors

Åsa Björklund

Paulo Czarnewski

Susanne Reinsbach

Roy Francis

Published

06-Feb-2024

Note

Code chunks run R commands unless otherwise specified.

In this tutorial we will cover differential gene expression, which comprises an extensive range of topics and methods. In single cell, differential expresison can have multiple functionalities such as identifying marker genes for cell populations, as well as identifying differentially regulated genes across conditions (healthy vs control). We will also cover controlling batch effect in your test.

We can first load the data from the clustering session. Moreover, we can already decide which clustering resolution to use. First let’s define using the louvain clustering to identifying differentially expressed genes.

suppressPackageStartupMessages({
    library(Seurat)
    library(dplyr)
    library(patchwork)
    library(ggplot2)
    library(pheatmap)
    library(enrichR)
    library(Matrix)
    library(edgeR)
    library(MAST)
})
# download pre-computed data if missing or long compute
fetch_data <- TRUE

# url for source and intermediate data
path_data <- "https://export.uppmax.uu.se/naiss2023-23-3/workshops/workshop-scrnaseq"
path_file <- "data/covid/results/seurat_covid_qc_dr_int_cl.rds"
if (!dir.exists(dirname(path_file))) dir.create(dirname(path_file), recursive = TRUE)
if (fetch_data && !file.exists(path_file)) download.file(url = file.path(path_data, "covid/results/seurat_covid_qc_dr_int_cl.rds"), destfile = path_file)
alldata <- readRDS(path_file)
# Set the identity as louvain with resolution 0.5
sel.clust <- "CCA_snn_res.0.5"

alldata <- SetIdent(alldata, value = sel.clust)
table(alldata@active.ident)

   0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9 
2063 1370 1037  648  542  364  362  337  334   77 
# plot this clustering
wrap_plots(
    DimPlot(alldata, label = T) + NoAxes(),
    DimPlot(alldata, group.by = "orig.ident") + NoAxes(),
    DimPlot(alldata, group.by = "type") + NoAxes(),
    ncol = 3
)

1 Cell marker genes

Let us first compute a ranking for the highly differential genes in each cluster. There are many different tests and parameters to be chosen that can be used to refine your results. When looking for marker genes, we want genes that are positively expressed in a cell type and possibly not expressed in others.

# Compute differentiall expression
markers_genes <- FindAllMarkers(
    alldata,
    log2FC.threshold = 0.2,
    test.use = "wilcox",
    min.pct = 0.1,
    min.diff.pct = 0.2,
    only.pos = TRUE,
    max.cells.per.ident = 50,
    assay = "RNA"
)

We can now select the top 25 overexpressed genes for plotting.

markers_genes %>%
    group_by(cluster) %>%
    top_n(-25, p_val_adj) -> top25
head(top25)
par(mfrow = c(2, 5), mar = c(4, 6, 3, 1))
for (i in unique(top25$cluster)) {
    barplot(sort(setNames(top25$avg_log2FC, top25$gene)[top25$cluster == i], F),
        horiz = T, las = 1, main = paste0(i, " vs. rest"), border = "white", yaxs = "i"
    )
    abline(v = c(0, 0.25), lty = c(1, 2))
}

We can visualize them as a heatmap. Here we are selecting the top 5.

markers_genes %>%
    group_by(cluster) %>%
    slice_min(p_val_adj, n = 5, with_ties = FALSE) -> top5
# create a scale.data slot for the selected genes
alldata <- ScaleData(alldata, features = as.character(unique(top5$gene)), assay = "RNA")
DoHeatmap(alldata, features = as.character(unique(top5$gene)), group.by = sel.clust, assay = "RNA")

Another way is by representing the overall group expression and detection rates in a dot-plot.

DotPlot(alldata, features = rev(as.character(unique(top5$gene))), group.by = sel.clust, assay = "RNA") + coord_flip()

We can also plot a violin plot for each gene.

# take top 3 genes per cluster/
top5 %>%
    group_by(cluster) %>%
    top_n(-3, p_val) -> top3

# set pt.size to zero if you do not want all the points to hide the violin shapes, or to a small value like 0.1
VlnPlot(alldata, features = as.character(unique(top3$gene)), ncol = 5, group.by = sel.clust, assay = "RNA", pt.size = 0)

Discuss

Take a screenshot of those results and re-run the same code above with another test: “wilcox” (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test), “bimod” (Likelihood-ratio test), “roc” (Identifies ‘markers’ of gene expression using ROC analysis),“t” (Student’s t-test),“negbinom” (negative binomial generalized linear model),“poisson” (poisson generalized linear model), “LR” (logistic regression), “MAST” (hurdle model), “DESeq2” (negative binomial distribution).

1.1 DGE with equal amount of cells

The number of cells per cluster differ quite a bit in this data

table(alldata@active.ident)

   0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9 
2063 1370 1037  648  542  364  362  337  334   77

Hence when we run FindAllMarkers one cluster vs rest, the largest cluster (cluster 0) will dominate the “rest” and influence the results the most. So it is often a good idea to subsample the clusters to an equal number of cells before running differential expression for one vs rest. So lets select 300 cells per cluster:

sub <- subset(alldata, cells = WhichCells(alldata, downsample = 300))
table(sub@active.ident)

  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9 
300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300  77

Now rerun FindAllMarkers with this set and compare the results.

markers_genes_sub <- FindAllMarkers(
    sub,
    log2FC.threshold = 0.2,
    test.use = "wilcox",
    min.pct = 0.1,
    min.diff.pct = 0.2,
    only.pos = TRUE,
    max.cells.per.ident = 50,
    assay = "RNA"
)

The number of significant genes per cluster has changed, with more for some clusters and less for others.

table(markers_genes$cluster)

   0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9 
1018  119  100  156  122  114  157   68  720  186 
table(markers_genes_sub$cluster)

   0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9 
1024  152  119  161  112   65  208   50  938  221 
markers_genes_sub %>%
    group_by(cluster) %>%
    slice_min(p_val_adj, n = 5, with_ties = FALSE) -> top5_sub

DotPlot(alldata, features = rev(as.character(unique(top5_sub$gene))), group.by = sel.clust, assay = "RNA") + coord_flip()

2 DGE across conditions

The second way of computing differential expression is to answer which genes are differentially expressed within a cluster. For example, in our case we have libraries comming from patients and controls and we would like to know which genes are influenced the most in a particular cell type. For this end, we will first subset our data for the desired cell cluster, then change the cell identities to the variable of comparison (which now in our case is the type, e.g. Covid/Ctrl).

# select all cells in cluster 1
cell_selection <- subset(alldata, cells = colnames(alldata)[alldata@meta.data[, sel.clust] == 3])
cell_selection <- SetIdent(cell_selection, value = "type")
# Compute differentiall expression
DGE_cell_selection <- FindAllMarkers(cell_selection,
    log2FC.threshold = 0.2,
    test.use = "wilcox",
    min.pct = 0.1,
    min.diff.pct = 0.2,
    only.pos = TRUE,
    max.cells.per.ident = 50,
    assay = "RNA"
)

We can now plot the expression across the type.

DGE_cell_selection %>%
    group_by(cluster) %>%
    top_n(-5, p_val) -> top5_cell_selection
VlnPlot(cell_selection, features = as.character(unique(top5_cell_selection$gene)), ncol = 5, group.by = "type", assay = "RNA", pt.size = .1)

We can also plot these genes across all clusters, but split by type, to check if the genes are also over/under expressed in other celltypes.

VlnPlot(alldata,
    features = as.character(unique(top5_cell_selection$gene)),
    ncol = 4, split.by = "type", assay = "RNA", pt.size = 0
)

As you can see, we have many sex chromosome related genes among the top DE genes. And if you remember from the QC lab, we have unbalanced sex distribution among our subjects, so this may not be related to covid at all.

2.1 Remove sex chromosome genes

To remove some of the bias due to unbalanced sex in the subjects, we can remove the sex chromosome related genes.

genes_file <- file.path("data/covid/results/genes_table.csv")
if (!file.exists(genes_file)) download.file(file.path(path_data, "covid/results/genes_table.csv"), destfile = genes_file)
gene.info <- read.csv(genes_file) # was created in the QC exercise

auto.genes <- gene.info$external_gene_name[!(gene.info$chromosome_name %in% c("X", "Y"))]

cell_selection@active.assay <- "RNA"
keep.genes <- intersect(rownames(cell_selection), auto.genes)
cell_selection <- cell_selection[keep.genes, ]

# then renormalize the data
cell_selection <- NormalizeData(cell_selection)

Rerun differential expression:

# Compute differential expression
DGE_cell_selection <- FindMarkers(cell_selection,
    ident.1 = "Covid", ident.2 = "Ctrl",
    logfc.threshold = 0.2, test.use = "wilcox", min.pct = 0.1,
    min.diff.pct = 0.2, assay = "RNA"
)

# Define as Covid or Ctrl in the df and add a gene column
DGE_cell_selection$direction <- ifelse(DGE_cell_selection$avg_log2FC > 0, "Covid", "Ctrl")
DGE_cell_selection$gene <- rownames(DGE_cell_selection)


DGE_cell_selection %>%
    group_by(direction) %>%
    top_n(-5, p_val) %>%
    arrange(direction) -> top5_cell_selection
VlnPlot(cell_selection,
    features = as.character(unique(top5_cell_selection$gene)),
    ncol = 5, group.by = "type", assay = "RNA", pt.size = .1
)

We can also plot these genes across all clusters, but split by type, to check if the genes are also over/under expressed in other celltypes/clusters.

VlnPlot(alldata,
    features = as.character(unique(top5_cell_selection$gene)),
    ncol = 4, split.by = "type", assay = "RNA", pt.size = 0
)

3 Patient Batch effects

When we are testing for Covid vs Control, we are running a DGE test for 4 vs 4 individuals. That will be very sensitive to sample differences unless we find a way to control for it. So first, let’s check how the top DEGs are expressed across the individuals within cluster 3:

VlnPlot(cell_selection, group.by = "orig.ident", features = as.character(unique(top5_cell_selection$gene)), ncol = 4, assay = "RNA", pt.size = 0)

As you can see, many of the genes detected as DGE in Covid are unique to one or 2 patients.

We can examine more genes with a DotPlot:

DGE_cell_selection %>%
    group_by(direction) %>%
    top_n(-20, p_val) -> top20_cell_selection
DotPlot(cell_selection, features = rev(as.character(unique(top20_cell_selection$gene))), group.by = "orig.ident", assay = "RNA") + coord_flip() + RotatedAxis()

As you can see, most of the DGEs are driven by the covid_17 patient. It is also a sample with very high number of cells:

table(cell_selection$orig.ident)

 covid_1 covid_15 covid_16 covid_17  ctrl_13  ctrl_14  ctrl_19   ctrl_5 
      94       32       36      175       65       62       38      146

4 Subsample

So one obvious thing to consider is an equal amount of cells per individual so that the DGE results are not dominated by a single sample.

We will use the downsample option in the Seurat function WhichCells() to select 30 cells per cluster:

cell_selection <- SetIdent(cell_selection, value = "orig.ident")
sub_data <- subset(cell_selection, cells = WhichCells(cell_selection, downsample = 30))

table(sub_data$orig.ident)

 covid_1 covid_15 covid_16 covid_17  ctrl_13  ctrl_14  ctrl_19   ctrl_5 
      30       30       30       30       30       30       30       30

And now we run DGE analysis again:

sub_data <- SetIdent(sub_data, value = "type")

# Compute differentiall expression
DGE_sub <- FindMarkers(sub_data,
    ident.1 = "Covid", ident.2 = "Ctrl",
    logfc.threshold = 0.2, test.use = "wilcox", min.pct = 0.1,
    min.diff.pct = 0.2, assay = "RNA"
)

# Define as Covid or Ctrl in the df and add a gene column
DGE_sub$direction <- ifelse(DGE_sub$avg_log2FC > 0, "Covid", "Ctrl")
DGE_sub$gene <- rownames(DGE_sub)


DGE_sub %>%
    group_by(direction) %>%
    top_n(-5, p_val) %>%
    arrange(direction) -> top5_sub

VlnPlot(sub_data,
    features = as.character(unique(top5_sub$gene)),
    ncol = 5, group.by = "type", assay = "RNA", pt.size = .1
)

Plot as dotplot, but in the full (not subsampled) data, still only showing cluster 3:

DGE_sub %>%
    group_by(direction) %>%
    top_n(-20, p_val) -> top20_sub
DotPlot(cell_selection, features = rev(as.character(unique(top20_sub$gene))), group.by = "orig.ident", assay = "RNA") +
    coord_flip() + RotatedAxis()

It looks much better now. But if we look per patient you can see that we still have some genes that are dominated by a single patient.

Why do you think this is?

5 Pseudobulk

One option is to treat the samples as pseudobulks and do differential expression for the 4 patients vs 4 controls. You do lose some information about cell variability within each patient, but instead you gain the advantage of mainly looking for effects that are seen in multiple patients.

However, having only 4 patients is perhaps too low, with many more patients it will work better to run pseudobulk analysis.

For a fair comparison we should have equal number of cells per sample when we create the pseudobulk, so we will use the subsampled object.

# get the count matrix for all cells
DGE_DATA <- sub_data@assays$RNA@counts

# Compute pseudobulk
mm <- Matrix::sparse.model.matrix(~ 0 + sub_data$orig.ident)
pseudobulk <- DGE_DATA %*% mm

Then run edgeR:

# define the groups
bulk.labels <- c("Covid", "Covid", "Covid", "Covid", "Ctrl", "Ctrl", "Ctrl", "Ctrl")

dge.list <- DGEList(counts = pseudobulk, group = factor(bulk.labels))
keep <- filterByExpr(dge.list)
dge.list <- dge.list[keep, , keep.lib.sizes = FALSE]

dge.list <- calcNormFactors(dge.list)
design <- model.matrix(~bulk.labels)

dge.list <- estimateDisp(dge.list, design)

fit <- glmQLFit(dge.list, design)
qlf <- glmQLFTest(fit, coef = 2)
topTags(qlf)
Coefficient:  bulk.labelsCtrl 
            logFC   logCPM         F       PValue        FDR
S100A8 -2.4863938 7.006589 34.462605 1.942760e-05 0.01979423
S100A9 -2.8060736 7.401199 33.402717 2.373409e-05 0.01979423
IGHA1  -2.7740516 6.943804 17.008701 7.034543e-04 0.39112058
TLE1   -1.1231021 7.298064 13.511449 1.926062e-03 0.69475728
PIM3   -1.4403746 7.806830 12.753251 2.406640e-03 0.69475728
STAG3  -2.3187464 7.374488 12.648031 2.499127e-03 0.69475728
AHNAK   1.0310786 7.812026 11.405789 3.650736e-03 0.70360430
SNHG15 -0.9804661 6.858538 10.014206 5.788450e-03 0.70360430
CCR7   -1.2732118 7.973903  9.934437 5.913216e-03 0.70360430
CEMIP2 -1.3381862 7.562814  9.729066 6.351110e-03 0.70360430

As you can see, we have very few significant genes. Since we only have 4 vs 4 samples, we should not expect to find many genes with this method.

Again as dotplot including top 10 genes:

res.edgeR <- topTags(qlf, 100)$table
res.edgeR$dir <- ifelse(res.edgeR$logFC > 0, "Covid", "Ctrl")
res.edgeR$gene <- rownames(res.edgeR)

res.edgeR %>%
    group_by(dir) %>%
    top_n(-10, PValue) %>%
    arrange(dir) -> top.edgeR

DotPlot(cell_selection,
    features = as.character(unique(top.edgeR$gene)), group.by = "orig.ident",
    assay = "RNA"
) + coord_flip() + ggtitle("EdgeR pseudobulk") + RotatedAxis()

As you can see, even if we find few genes, they seem to make sense across all the patients.

6 MAST random effect

MAST has the option to add a random effect for the patient when running DGE analysis. It is quite slow, even with this small dataset, so it may not be practical for a larger dataset unless you have access to a compute cluster.

We will run MAST with and without patient info as random effect and compare the results

First, filter genes in part to speed up the process but also to avoid too many warnings in the model fitting step of MAST. We will keep genes that are expressed with at least 2 reads in 2 covid patients or 2 controls.

# select genes that are expressed in at least 2 patients or 2 ctrls with > 2 reads.
nPatient <- sapply(unique(cell_selection$orig.ident), function(x) {
    rowSums(cell_selection@assays$RNA@counts[, cell_selection$orig.ident
    == x] > 2)
})
nCovid <- rowSums(nPatient[, 1:4] > 2)
nCtrl <- rowSums(nPatient[, 5:8] > 2)

sel <- nCovid >= 2 | nCtrl >= 2
cell_selection_sub <- cell_selection[sel, ]

Set up the MAST object.

# create the feature data
fData <- data.frame(primerid = rownames(cell_selection_sub))
m <- cell_selection_sub@meta.data
m$wellKey <- rownames(m)

# make sure type and orig.ident are factors
m$orig.ident <- factor(m$orig.ident)
m$type <- factor(m$type)

sca <- MAST::FromMatrix(
    exprsArray = as.matrix(x = cell_selection_sub@assays$RNA@data),
    check_sanity = FALSE, cData = m, fData = fData
)

First, run the regular MAST analysis without random effects

# takes a while to run, so save a file to tmpdir in case you have to rerun the code
tmpdir <- "data/covid/results/tmp_dge"
dir.create(tmpdir, showWarnings = F)

tmpfile1 <- file.path(tmpdir, "mast_bayesglm_cl3.Rds")
if (file.exists(tmpfile1)) {
    fcHurdle1 <- readRDS(tmpfile1)
} else {
    zlmCond <- suppressMessages(MAST::zlm(~ type + nFeature_RNA, sca, method = "bayesglm", ebayes = T))
    summaryCond <- suppressMessages(MAST::summary(zlmCond, doLRT = "typeCtrl"))
    summaryDt <- summaryCond$datatable
    fcHurdle <- merge(summaryDt[summaryDt$contrast == "typeCtrl" & summaryDt$component ==
        "logFC", c(1, 7, 5, 6, 8)], summaryDt[summaryDt$contrast == "typeCtrl" &
        summaryDt$component == "H", c(1, 4)], by = "primerid")
    fcHurdle1 <- stats::na.omit(as.data.frame(fcHurdle))
    saveRDS(fcHurdle1, tmpfile1)
}

Then run MAST with glmer and random effect.

library(lme4)

tmpfile2 <- file.path(tmpdir, "mast_glme_cl3.Rds")
if (file.exists(tmpfile2)) {
    fcHurdle2 <- readRDS(tmpfile2)
} else {
    zlmCond <- suppressMessages(MAST::zlm(~ type + nFeature_RNA + (1 | orig.ident), sca,
        method = "glmer",
        ebayes = F, strictConvergence = FALSE
    ))

    summaryCond <- suppressMessages(MAST::summary(zlmCond, doLRT = "typeCtrl"))
    summaryDt <- summaryCond$datatable
    fcHurdle <- merge(summaryDt[summaryDt$contrast == "typeCtrl" & summaryDt$component ==
        "logFC", c(1, 7, 5, 6, 8)], summaryDt[summaryDt$contrast == "typeCtrl" &
        summaryDt$component == "H", c(1, 4)], by = "primerid")
    fcHurdle2 <- stats::na.omit(as.data.frame(fcHurdle))
    saveRDS(fcHurdle2, tmpfile2)
}

Top genes with normal MAST:

top1 <- head(fcHurdle1[order(fcHurdle1$`Pr(>Chisq)`), ], 10)
top1
fcHurdle1$pval <- fcHurdle1$`Pr(>Chisq)`
fcHurdle1$dir <- ifelse(fcHurdle1$z > 0, "Ctrl", "Covid")
fcHurdle1 %>%
    group_by(dir) %>%
    top_n(-10, pval) %>%
    arrange(z) -> mastN

mastN <- mastN$primerid

Top genes with random effect:

top2 <- head(fcHurdle2[order(fcHurdle2$`Pr(>Chisq)`), ], 10)
top2
fcHurdle2$pval <- fcHurdle2$`Pr(>Chisq)`
fcHurdle2$dir <- ifelse(fcHurdle2$z > 0, "Ctrl", "Covid")
fcHurdle2 %>%
    group_by(dir) %>%
    top_n(-10, pval) %>%
    arrange(z) -> mastR

mastR <- mastR$primerid

As you can see, we have lower significance for the genes with the random effect added.

Dotplot for top 10 genes in each direction:

p1 <- DotPlot(cell_selection, features = mastN, group.by = "orig.ident", assay = "RNA") +
    coord_flip() + RotatedAxis() + ggtitle("Regular MAST")

p2 <- DotPlot(cell_selection, features = mastR, group.by = "orig.ident", assay = "RNA") +
    coord_flip() + RotatedAxis() + ggtitle("With random effect")

p1 + p2

Discuss

You have now run DGE analysis for Covid vs Ctrl in cluster 3 with several diffent methods. Have a look at the different results. Where did you get more/less significant genes? Which results would you like to present in a paper? Discuss with a neighbor which one you think looks best and why.

7 Gene Set Analysis (GSA)

7.1 Hypergeometric enrichment test

Having a defined list of differentially expressed genes, you can now look for their combined function using hypergeometric test.

In this case we will use the DGE from MAST with random effect to run enrichment analysis.

# Load additional packages
library(enrichR)

# Check available databases to perform enrichment (then choose one)
enrichR::listEnrichrDbs()
# Perform enrichment
enrich_results <- enrichr(
    genes     = fcHurdle2$primerid[fcHurdle2$z < 0 & fcHurdle2$pval < 0.05],
    databases = "GO_Biological_Process_2017b"
)[[1]]
Uploading data to Enrichr... Done.
  Querying GO_Biological_Process_2017b... Done.
Parsing results... Done.

Some databases of interest:
GO_Biological_Process_2017bKEGG_2019_HumanKEGG_2019_MouseWikiPathways_2019_HumanWikiPathways_2019_Mouse
You visualize your results using a simple barplot, for example:

par(mfrow = c(1, 1), mar = c(3, 25, 2, 1))
barplot(
    height = -log10(enrich_results$P.value)[10:1],
    names.arg = enrich_results$Term[10:1],
    horiz = TRUE,
    las = 1,
    border = FALSE,
    cex.names = .6
)
abline(v = c(-log10(0.05)), lty = 2)
abline(v = 0, lty = 1)

8 Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)

Besides the enrichment using hypergeometric test, we can also perform gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), which scores ranked genes list (usually based on fold changes) and computes permutation test to check if a particular gene set is more present in the Up-regulated genes, among the DOWN_regulated genes or not differentially regulated.

Before, we ran FindMarkers() with the default settings for reporting only significantly up/down regulated genes, but now we need statistics on a larger set of genes, so we will have to rerun the test with more lenient cutoffs.

sub_data <- SetIdent(sub_data, value = "type")

DGE_cell_selection2 <- FindMarkers(
    sub_data,
    ident.1 = "Covid",
    log2FC.threshold = -Inf,
    test.use = "wilcox",
    min.pct = 0.05,
    min.diff.pct = 0,
    only.pos = FALSE,
    max.cells.per.ident = 50,
    assay = "RNA"
)

# Create a gene rank based on the gene expression fold change
gene_rank <- setNames(DGE_cell_selection2$avg_log2FC, casefold(rownames(DGE_cell_selection2), upper = T))

Once our list of genes are sorted, we can proceed with the enrichment itself. We can use the package to get gene set from the Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB) and select KEGG pathways as an example.

library(msigdbr)

# Download gene sets
msigdbgmt <- msigdbr::msigdbr("Homo sapiens")
msigdbgmt <- as.data.frame(msigdbgmt)

# List available gene sets
unique(msigdbgmt$gs_subcat)
 [1] "MIR:MIR_Legacy"  "TFT:TFT_Legacy"  "CGP"             "TFT:GTRD"       
 [5] ""                "VAX"             "CP:BIOCARTA"     "CGN"            
 [9] "GO:BP"           "GO:CC"           "IMMUNESIGDB"     "GO:MF"          
[13] "HPO"             "CP:KEGG"         "MIR:MIRDB"       "CM"             
[17] "CP"              "CP:PID"          "CP:REACTOME"     "CP:WIKIPATHWAYS"
# Subset which gene set you want to use.
msigdbgmt_subset <- msigdbgmt[msigdbgmt$gs_subcat == "CP:WIKIPATHWAYS", ]
gmt <- lapply(unique(msigdbgmt_subset$gs_name), function(x) {
    msigdbgmt_subset[msigdbgmt_subset$gs_name == x, "gene_symbol"]
})
names(gmt) <- unique(paste0(msigdbgmt_subset$gs_name, "_", msigdbgmt_subset$gs_exact_source))

Next, we will run GSEA. This will result in a table containing information for several pathways. We can then sort and filter those pathways to visualize only the top ones. You can select/filter them by either p-value or normalized enrichment score (NES).

library(fgsea)

# Perform enrichemnt analysis
fgseaRes <- fgsea(pathways = gmt, stats = gene_rank, minSize = 15, maxSize = 500)
fgseaRes <- fgseaRes[order(fgseaRes$pval, decreasing = T), ]

# Filter the results table to show only the top 10 UP or DOWN regulated processes (optional)
top10_UP <- fgseaRes$pathway[1:10]

# Nice summary table (shown as a plot)
plotGseaTable(gmt[top10_UP], gene_rank, fgseaRes, gseaParam = 0.5)

Discuss

Which KEGG pathways are upregulated in this cluster? Which KEGG pathways are dowregulated in this cluster? Change the pathway source to another gene set (e.g. CP:WIKIPATHWAYS or CP:REACTOME or CP:BIOCARTA or GO:BP) and check the if you get similar results?

9 Session info

Click here 
sessionInfo()
R version 4.3.0 (2023-04-21)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS

Matrix products: default
BLAS:   /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/libblas.so.3 
LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/libopenblasp-r0.3.20.so;  LAPACK version 3.10.0

locale:
 [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C              
 [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8        LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8    
 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8   
 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C                 
 [9] LC_ADDRESS=C               LC_TELEPHONE=C            
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C       

time zone: Etc/UTC
tzcode source: system (glibc)

attached base packages:
[1] stats4    stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods  
[8] base     

other attached packages:
 [1] fgsea_1.28.0                msigdbr_7.5.1              
 [3] lme4_1.1-33                 MAST_1.28.0                
 [5] SingleCellExperiment_1.24.0 SummarizedExperiment_1.32.0
 [7] Biobase_2.62.0              GenomicRanges_1.54.1       
 [9] GenomeInfoDb_1.38.5         IRanges_2.36.0             
[11] S4Vectors_0.40.2            BiocGenerics_0.48.1        
[13] MatrixGenerics_1.14.0       matrixStats_1.0.0          
[15] edgeR_4.0.7                 limma_3.58.1               
[17] Matrix_1.5-4                enrichR_3.2                
[19] pheatmap_1.0.12             ggplot2_3.4.2              
[21] patchwork_1.1.2             dplyr_1.1.2                
[23] SeuratObject_4.1.3          Seurat_4.3.0               

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
  [1] RcppAnnoy_0.0.20        splines_4.3.0           later_1.3.1            
  [4] bitops_1.0-7            tibble_3.2.1            polyclip_1.10-4        
  [7] lifecycle_1.0.3         globals_0.16.2          lattice_0.21-8         
 [10] MASS_7.3-58.4           magrittr_2.0.3          plotly_4.10.2          
 [13] rmarkdown_2.22          yaml_2.3.7              httpuv_1.6.11          
 [16] sctransform_0.3.5       sp_1.6-1                spatstat.sparse_3.0-1  
 [19] reticulate_1.30         cowplot_1.1.1           pbapply_1.7-0          
 [22] minqa_1.2.5             RColorBrewer_1.1-3      abind_1.4-5            
 [25] zlibbioc_1.48.0         Rtsne_0.16              purrr_1.0.1            
 [28] RCurl_1.98-1.12         WriteXLS_6.4.0          GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.11
 [31] ggrepel_0.9.3           irlba_2.3.5.1           listenv_0.9.0          
 [34] spatstat.utils_3.0-3    goftest_1.2-3           spatstat.random_3.1-5  
 [37] fitdistrplus_1.1-11     parallelly_1.36.0       leiden_0.4.3           
 [40] codetools_0.2-19        DelayedArray_0.28.0     tidyselect_1.2.0       
 [43] farver_2.1.1            spatstat.explore_3.2-1  jsonlite_1.8.5         
 [46] ellipsis_0.3.2          progressr_0.13.0        ggridges_0.5.4         
 [49] survival_3.5-5          tools_4.3.0             ica_1.0-3              
 [52] Rcpp_1.0.10             glue_1.6.2              gridExtra_2.3          
 [55] SparseArray_1.2.3       xfun_0.39               withr_2.5.0            
 [58] fastmap_1.1.1           boot_1.3-28.1           fansi_1.0.4            
 [61] digest_0.6.31           R6_2.5.1                mime_0.12              
 [64] colorspace_2.1-0        scattermore_1.2         tensor_1.5             
 [67] spatstat.data_3.0-1     utf8_1.2.3              tidyr_1.3.0            
 [70] generics_0.1.3          data.table_1.14.8       httr_1.4.6             
 [73] htmlwidgets_1.6.2       S4Arrays_1.2.0          uwot_0.1.14            
 [76] pkgconfig_2.0.3         gtable_0.3.3            lmtest_0.9-40          
 [79] XVector_0.42.0          htmltools_0.5.5         scales_1.2.1           
 [82] png_0.1-8               knitr_1.43              rstudioapi_0.14        
 [85] reshape2_1.4.4          rjson_0.2.21            nlme_3.1-162           
 [88] curl_5.0.1              nloptr_2.0.3            zoo_1.8-12             
 [91] stringr_1.5.0           KernSmooth_2.23-20      parallel_4.3.0         
 [94] miniUI_0.1.1.1          pillar_1.9.0            grid_4.3.0             
 [97] vctrs_0.6.2             RANN_2.6.1              promises_1.2.0.1       
[100] xtable_1.8-4            cluster_2.1.4           evaluate_0.21          
[103] cli_3.6.1               locfit_1.5-9.8          compiler_4.3.0         
[106] rlang_1.1.1             crayon_1.5.2            future.apply_1.11.0    
[109] labeling_0.4.2          plyr_1.8.8              stringi_1.7.12         
[112] BiocParallel_1.36.0     viridisLite_0.4.2       deldir_1.0-9           
[115] babelgene_22.9          munsell_0.5.0           lazyeval_0.2.2         
[118] spatstat.geom_3.2-1     future_1.32.0           statmod_1.5.0          
[121] shiny_1.7.4             ROCR_1.0-11             igraph_1.4.3           
[124] fastmatch_1.1-3